Mr.Cipher

True, but to deny that there is unity against smashers, specially the melee variety is no bueno.

And I explained why I have problems with what they tried.
Is one thing to try and add new stuff and there is another to change everything that give the game its identity that it makes it a totally different thing altogether.
Strive offers 0 of what I like about GG.
 
And my point is not about changing established series to the point of not recognition, but creating new concepts for new games., exploring game mechanics, and such.
Hence the use of the word Innovation, Strive is not innovative in the sightless, since is actually reductive in every aspect of its design when compared to all the previous GG games.
It was what I liked from them prior Strive, where instead of dumbing down GG for example, they created BB as a way to explore new ideas that didn't fit the GG mold, or how Persona introduces its own way to make the game simpler in some areas, but keep complexity in others, the same for BBTAG.
 
With Strive all that shit is thrown out of the window, with a game that is 1st made for people who dislike GG, and then nothing for those who like previous GG games.
 
Hardly a swing and miss when my point is not about whatever lame  attempt of deflection of the subject you are trying to do.
 
But keep going, you only prove how full of shit your argument is, when you are so afraid to actually engage on it to try to defend your position.
What will be your next deflection?
Point out my english skills and my gramatical/ortographic errors? 🤣
 
 
 

The Irony that ArcSys tried something new with Strive and you keep shitting on it.
 
Swing and an oof.
 
🧐

LMAO at this nonsensical shit.
Like I said, only ad hominems and revisionist history, just proving my point.
I can dig up plenty of posts here, on srk and dustloop of me talking about games that I like that I acknowledge that are bad, like Hokuto no Ken and Sengoku Basara X to keep it with games developed by ASW
 
And games that I do not like to play but acknowledge that are not bad at all, like MVC2, and even Strive which  I admitted that is a competent game, just a trash GG.
 
When I point that X or Y is bad I do lay down my points.
And post walls of text when i have the chance, and many people here wouldn't let me lie on that.
 
Yes, you bring points, AT TIMES, but most of the time, specially regarding this subject has been only an increasing amount of retardation that amounts to nothing.
Where you point shit that are not problems just because is not what you would like them to do, since you would prefer a balance approach like capcom does (LMAO), it is a bad thing.
 
Like you complain to me about Strive, and the moment I say that Strive is trash as jest, you start defending that game, make up your mind bro 🤣
 
 
Also, you say questionable mechanics, yet as usual, your complains usually boil down to preference.
And when they fuck up the mechanics, which BTW, I have pointed out plenty of times when they do, but in your no see monkey no hear monkey decide to ignore to push the narrative of a defense force, they are quick to fix or abandon, like the guard lybra on BBCT for example.
 
If anything, is something to appreciate that they are willing to go and explore options to push their games instead of retreating to the same old, but hey, i guess that pushing for innovations is a bad thing now, lol.

No I don't. When I like something I just say I like it. I dont justify what I like as being good.  Because things don't have to be good for me to like them.
 
When I say something is bad, I explain why it's bad and provide receipts. The only one that has ever said "oh some people like it so its fine" is you.
 
ArcSys has a history of wack balancing and questionable mechanics. If they didn't have cool looking characters and neat music, they'd get talked about in a way different fashion.

🤣
 
Nigga, you are the one that keeps confusing your personal preferences with facts, and keeps living on a made up world of your own making where no one complains about ASW apparently (Do I need to go on another diatribe of why Strive is garbage for example?)
But yeah, instead of trying to argue like an adult keep doing ad hoiminems since is the only thing that you can do when you say this kind of dumb shit.

No they don't. People just meme them to be balanced. 
 
ArcSys Defense Force is stronger than anything in the FGC.

I wish I could go to let them know how fucking trash they are at balancing their games.
 
Oh well, missed opportunities and all that.

I think that was Snake Eyez

The SNK Bingo is somewhat accurate, I would like Momoko to be in  more than just KoF XI.
Also they really need to fix the MM on XV, i do not know how they managed it to make the game Match you based on your system language.

The SNK Bingo is somewhat accurate, I would like Momoko to be in  more than just KoF XI.
Also they really need to fix the MM on XV, i do not know how they managed it to make the game Match you based on your system language.

As an European it was always hard for me to understand American culture.
What was fascinating for me is that they like bragging about their freedom which was weird for me, because I didn't think that I have any less freedom than them.
I always thought 'What is the difference'. However after this event I finally understand it.
 
NA is just so fucking free.

i see a lot of people express that and dont really get why
sure, the tower was not very good as a ranked mode, in that skill level at floors 10/celestial varied wildly within floors much less between them. You can also pick matches, dodge people etc which is wack for a ranked mode
 
h o w e v e r
 
the tower was great in that it put everyone playing in the same place, and had enough social functions to meet or target specific people in it. I thought it was pretty cool that I can see top players grinding and play them if I want/go out of my way to get specific character matchup exp. It was a flawed take on ranked in that it didnt really provide an actual rank to grind and had DIY matchmaking, but I think it was actually fantastic for trying to get better/meeting consistent players. I think it had more to offer than the bog standard netplay options and hope to see more like it in the future

Honestly I much rather have the tower than the goofy DNF/SF5 rank system.
 
 

Multiverse will probably stay healthy and keep people longer hooked than other FGs.

It is simple to see why and thats the way the online is handeld, as well as part of the game structure.
 
Unless something was changed, the online is standard 2v2, meaning there is always someone else to blame for when you lose.
There are also perks, so you can blame loses on having the wrong or "underpowerd" perks.
 
That alone will keep people playing longer, add to that that the game is F2P, which means you lose nothing for trying it.
 
Yes of course, it isn't like we already have this trend since 2016.
No not at all, look how alive and well SFIV is!

Multiverse will probably stay healthy and keep people longer hooked than other FGs.

It is simple to see why and thats the way the online is handeld, as well as part of the game structure.
 
Unless something was changed, the online is standard 2v2, meaning there is always someone else to blame for when you lose.
There are also perks, so you can blame loses on having the wrong or "underpowerd" perks.
 
That alone will keep people playing longer, add to that that the game is F2P, which means you lose nothing for trying it.
 
Yes of course, it isn't like we already have this trend since 2016.
No not at all, look how alive and well SFIV is!

Then how do you explain people still playing 3S to this day?
Ain't much better of a game, would argure that it's even worse than IV.
Or what came after it, what might also be somehow worse.
 
Then again for the later, I guess money can move a lot.

Multiverse will probably stay healthy and keep people longer hooked than other FGs.

It is simple to see why and thats the way the online is handeld, as well as part of the game structure.
 
Unless something was changed, the online is standard 2v2, meaning there is always someone else to blame for when you lose.
There are also perks, so you can blame loses on having the wrong or "underpowerd" perks.
 
That alone will keep people playing longer, add to that that the game is F2P, which means you lose nothing for trying it.
 
Yes of course, it isn't like we already have this trend since 2016.
No not at all, look how alive and well SFIV is!

Multiverse will probably stay healthy and keep people longer hooked than other FGs.

It is simple to see why and thats the way the online is handeld, as well as part of the game structure.
 
Unless something was changed, the online is standard 2v2, meaning there is always someone else to blame for when you lose.
There are also perks, so you can blame loses on having the wrong or "underpowerd" perks.
 
That alone will keep people playing longer, add to that that the game is F2P, which means you lose nothing for trying it.
 
Yes of course, it isn't like we already have this trend since 2016.
No not at all, look how alive and well SFIV is!

Multiverse will probably stay healthy and keep people longer hooked than other FGs.

It is simple to see why and thats the way the online is handeld, as well as part of the game structure.
 
Unless something was changed, the online is standard 2v2, meaning there is always someone else to blame for when you lose.
There are also perks, so you can blame loses on having the wrong or "underpowerd" perks.
 
That alone will keep people playing longer, add to that that the game is F2P, which means you lose nothing for trying it.
 
Yes of course, it isn't like we already have this trend since 2016.
No not at all, look how alive and well SFIV is!

THERE IS ONLY ONE PUNISHMENT FOR SUCH HERETICAL CRIMES!!!!
 

THERE IS ONLY ONE PUNISHMENT FOR SUCH HERETICAL CRIMES!!!!