IcyBlackDeep

im hurting right now.
my moms fell. on thanksgiving day.
and she fractured a bone in her spine. lower back. which is bad but what has me really worried. is that when she fell on her butt she also hit the back of her head n her head was bleeding. and swelled up. and ever since shes been getting more n more incoherent and nonsensical day by day.  she is in alotta pain in her lower back but its her head im worried about. she says her head doesnt hurt at all anymore but her incoherent talk is getting..worse.
im very worried.
i told the docs to get neurologists to examine her brain to see whats up. shes in the hospital rn. her lower back is one thing but her brain is another. more serious issue.
😟
pray for her please fellas.
 

It's not that complicated, you just need to take any Android phone, put your own store app on there along with Google Play store, and preload the Twitter app on it.  You don't need some new OS.
 
But I don't think people who buy iPhones buy anything other than iPhones.

It's not that complicated, you just need to take any Android phone, put your own store app on there along with Google Play store, and preload the Twitter app on it.  You don't need some new OS.
 
But I don't think people who buy iPhones buy anything other than iPhones.

Also, since no one else posted it:
 

Also, since no one else posted it:
 

Also, since no one else posted it:
 

Also, since no one else posted it:
 

Yes, but it's probably difficult to get your balls copyrighted.  I'm not sure of the legal standards, but I think the core is that copyright covers "creative works."  Your best bet may be to creatively embellish your balls, kind of like how Mike Tyson's face tattoo comes up as a copyright problem now and then.
 
Disclaimer: Do not tattoo your balls.  In fact, avoid needles anywhere near your balls if you can at all help it.

Yes, but it's probably difficult to get your balls copyrighted.  I'm not sure of the legal standards, but I think the core is that copyright covers "creative works."  Your best bet may be to creatively embellish your balls, kind of like how Mike Tyson's face tattoo comes up as a copyright problem now and then.
 
Disclaimer: Do not tattoo your balls.  In fact, avoid needles anywhere near your balls if you can at all help it.

Yes, but it's probably difficult to get your balls copyrighted.  I'm not sure of the legal standards, but I think the core is that copyright covers "creative works."  Your best bet may be to creatively embellish your balls, kind of like how Mike Tyson's face tattoo comes up as a copyright problem now and then.
 
Disclaimer: Do not tattoo your balls.  In fact, avoid needles anywhere near your balls if you can at all help it.

Yes, but it's probably difficult to get your balls copyrighted.  I'm not sure of the legal standards, but I think the core is that copyright covers "creative works."  Your best bet may be to creatively embellish your balls, kind of like how Mike Tyson's face tattoo comes up as a copyright problem now and then.
 
Disclaimer: Do not tattoo your balls.  In fact, avoid needles anywhere near your balls if you can at all help it.

You do.
 
But you probably grant Twitter some non-exclusive rights by the posting.

In the absence of a contract that says otherwise, the creator owns the copyright.  Unless the creator was paid to create the work, in which case the person paying them owns the copyright ("work for hire").
The rights Twitter gets are whatever is in their Terms of Service, which I'm not going to read but undoubtedly give them at least the right to display it on their own site.
The ball owner does not have any claim of ownership, but in this particular case they could probably go after you under various revenge-porn statutes and the like.  Maybe some kind of defamation too.
 
(The trickier bit is if you take a picture of something that is itself copyrighted.  Then you've probably made an unauthorized copy.  Unless it's fair use.  Fair use is a mess.)

In the absence of a contract that says otherwise, the creator owns the copyright.  Unless the creator was paid to create the work, in which case the person paying them owns the copyright ("work for hire").
The rights Twitter gets are whatever is in their Terms of Service, which I'm not going to read but undoubtedly give them at least the right to display it on their own site.
The ball owner does not have any claim of ownership, but in this particular case they could probably go after you under various revenge-porn statutes and the like.  Maybe some kind of defamation too.
 
(The trickier bit is if you take a picture of something that is itself copyrighted.  Then you've probably made an unauthorized copy.  Unless it's fair use.  Fair use is a mess.)

You do.
 
But you probably grant Twitter some non-exclusive rights by the posting.

This is the complete opposite of the specific case you're complaining about though.
Ariana Grande didn't create the photograph, therefore she doesn't have rights to it unless she gets them from the creator.  That's kind of the baseline.

I messed around with this but I don't think it works well with our current reaction system.
 
Currently 👎 is the only negative reaction.
 
When posts get a certain amount of negative reactions they get hidden.  I have it set this way so you guys can remove posts without admin/mod intervention. 
 
If I add angry/hate, it would probably also be a negative reaction.  I'm worried certain posts would get hidden by accident because people are reacting to an embedded twitter link they dislike rather than the post itself.
 
I'm also thinking of removing ☕.  Does anyone use it?

Seriously, what is up with YouTube lately?

Seriously, what is up with YouTube lately?

FGC needs to commit to old man status and go back to the forum format.