IcyBlackDeep

They're both loudmouths who spew misinformed opinions to their social media audiences while pretending to be lawmakers. I don't see much of a difference. There have always been people like them in government, they aren't the first, they won't be the last, but they're two sides of the same coin. MTG says things they get her attention just like AOC does. They may say different things, but they're playing the same game.

He’s also a sex trafficker and rapist. So there’s that. 

We have a regular at the hobby store I work at that just turned 21 that regurgitates the shit Andrew Tate spews. We constantly give him shit over it since he’s never even had a girlfriend. 

a lot of trans women do not do bottom surgery because of long term health concerns. Only extreme cases of gender dysphoria would take the risk because the risk of keeping it fuels their depression and dysphoria towards suicide ideation.
 
The other thing is the men who often date trans women and end up in relationships with them want them with their male genitals. I’ve met trans women that embrace this dichotomy, they recognize that they obviously are not women and never will be, but also that this experience is uniquely theirs as well.
 
Most trans people lead very quiet lives and they pass you without you probably even knowing. It’s these wild elements from the fringes and gen z bandwagoners that have unfortunately made a mockery of a serious mental and life condition.
 
please remember this and be kind. Retards like Dylan Mulvany do not represent all trans men and women.

Haikus are easy,
but sometimes they don’t make sense
refrigerator.

Haikus are easy,
but sometimes they don’t make sense
refrigerator.

Haikus are easy,
but sometimes they don’t make sense
refrigerator.

Haikus are easy,
but sometimes they don’t make sense
refrigerator.

Haikus are easy,
but sometimes they don’t make sense
refrigerator.

Haikus are easy,
but sometimes they don’t make sense
refrigerator.

How was she baited?
 
Interviewer: "Would you mind defining woke because it's come up a couple times and I want to be sure we are on the same page"
Bethany: WORDS
 
She set up an honest condition to have a discussion. This is not baiting. 
 
 

Just be sure to read the fine print if you end up at this.  Depends on the plan, but doing this you may have to immediately repay the whole loan if you leave your job.

Just be sure to read the fine print if you end up at this.  Depends on the plan, but doing this you may have to immediately repay the whole loan if you leave your job.

Just be sure to read the fine print if you end up at this.  Depends on the plan, but doing this you may have to immediately repay the whole loan if you leave your job.

I bought The Godfather box set many years ago.
 
 
Still never watched #3.

I bought The Godfather box set many years ago.
 
 
Still never watched #3.

Silicon Valley Bank kind of specialized in lending to new tech companies.  At first they had so much money deposited they didn't know what to do with it, so they invested it in long-term bonds and similar.  But now those tech companies aren't doing so great so they started pulling their money out of the bank.  In order to have enough cash to pay out, the bank had to sell some of those bonds they were holding, but because interest rates are much higher now than when they bought the bonds they took a big loss selling the bonds.  When people found out about that they all panicked that the bank wouldn't have enough cash and tried to pull out their deposits.  At which the government stepped in and shut things down.
The FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) was created during the Great Depression to stop exactly this sort of thing.  They guarantee that depositors will get their money back (so no need to panic anyone).  Except FDIC insurance only covers $250k and a lot of these companies had way more banked at SVB.  So there was a lot of hand-wringing that most American tech startups would get wiped out because they were so heavily concentrated in this one bank.  So now the FDIC is basically saying they'll guarantee deposits without any limit.
Investors in the bank get nothing though; if you own stock in SVB it's now worthless.
 
There seems to be some differing opinions on whether other banks may fail.  The FDIC actions are intended to prevent panic that would cause such a thing, and the FDIC insurance exists to minimize the impact to people with money in any such bank.  But it's nerve-wracking to be holding stock in a bank, especially a smaller one, so there's a big sell-off that's hammering stock prices.
 
There were also a couple banks that were heavily tied into crypto that went belly-up, but that's not really related.

Silicon Valley Bank kind of specialized in lending to new tech companies.  At first they had so much money deposited they didn't know what to do with it, so they invested it in long-term bonds and similar.  But now those tech companies aren't doing so great so they started pulling their money out of the bank.  In order to have enough cash to pay out, the bank had to sell some of those bonds they were holding, but because interest rates are much higher now than when they bought the bonds they took a big loss selling the bonds.  When people found out about that they all panicked that the bank wouldn't have enough cash and tried to pull out their deposits.  At which the government stepped in and shut things down.
The FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) was created during the Great Depression to stop exactly this sort of thing.  They guarantee that depositors will get their money back (so no need to panic anyone).  Except FDIC insurance only covers $250k and a lot of these companies had way more banked at SVB.  So there was a lot of hand-wringing that most American tech startups would get wiped out because they were so heavily concentrated in this one bank.  So now the FDIC is basically saying they'll guarantee deposits without any limit.
Investors in the bank get nothing though; if you own stock in SVB it's now worthless.
 
There seems to be some differing opinions on whether other banks may fail.  The FDIC actions are intended to prevent panic that would cause such a thing, and the FDIC insurance exists to minimize the impact to people with money in any such bank.  But it's nerve-wracking to be holding stock in a bank, especially a smaller one, so there's a big sell-off that's hammering stock prices.
 
There were also a couple banks that were heavily tied into crypto that went belly-up, but that's not really related.

Silicon Valley Bank kind of specialized in lending to new tech companies.  At first they had so much money deposited they didn't know what to do with it, so they invested it in long-term bonds and similar.  But now those tech companies aren't doing so great so they started pulling their money out of the bank.  In order to have enough cash to pay out, the bank had to sell some of those bonds they were holding, but because interest rates are much higher now than when they bought the bonds they took a big loss selling the bonds.  When people found out about that they all panicked that the bank wouldn't have enough cash and tried to pull out their deposits.  At which the government stepped in and shut things down.
The FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) was created during the Great Depression to stop exactly this sort of thing.  They guarantee that depositors will get their money back (so no need to panic anyone).  Except FDIC insurance only covers $250k and a lot of these companies had way more banked at SVB.  So there was a lot of hand-wringing that most American tech startups would get wiped out because they were so heavily concentrated in this one bank.  So now the FDIC is basically saying they'll guarantee deposits without any limit.
Investors in the bank get nothing though; if you own stock in SVB it's now worthless.
 
There seems to be some differing opinions on whether other banks may fail.  The FDIC actions are intended to prevent panic that would cause such a thing, and the FDIC insurance exists to minimize the impact to people with money in any such bank.  But it's nerve-wracking to be holding stock in a bank, especially a smaller one, so there's a big sell-off that's hammering stock prices.
 
There were also a couple banks that were heavily tied into crypto that went belly-up, but that's not really related.

Silicon Valley Bank kind of specialized in lending to new tech companies.  At first they had so much money deposited they didn't know what to do with it, so they invested it in long-term bonds and similar.  But now those tech companies aren't doing so great so they started pulling their money out of the bank.  In order to have enough cash to pay out, the bank had to sell some of those bonds they were holding, but because interest rates are much higher now than when they bought the bonds they took a big loss selling the bonds.  When people found out about that they all panicked that the bank wouldn't have enough cash and tried to pull out their deposits.  At which the government stepped in and shut things down.
The FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) was created during the Great Depression to stop exactly this sort of thing.  They guarantee that depositors will get their money back (so no need to panic anyone).  Except FDIC insurance only covers $250k and a lot of these companies had way more banked at SVB.  So there was a lot of hand-wringing that most American tech startups would get wiped out because they were so heavily concentrated in this one bank.  So now the FDIC is basically saying they'll guarantee deposits without any limit.
Investors in the bank get nothing though; if you own stock in SVB it's now worthless.
 
There seems to be some differing opinions on whether other banks may fail.  The FDIC actions are intended to prevent panic that would cause such a thing, and the FDIC insurance exists to minimize the impact to people with money in any such bank.  But it's nerve-wracking to be holding stock in a bank, especially a smaller one, so there's a big sell-off that's hammering stock prices.
 
There were also a couple banks that were heavily tied into crypto that went belly-up, but that's not really related.

Silicon Valley Bank kind of specialized in lending to new tech companies.  At first they had so much money deposited they didn't know what to do with it, so they invested it in long-term bonds and similar.  But now those tech companies aren't doing so great so they started pulling their money out of the bank.  In order to have enough cash to pay out, the bank had to sell some of those bonds they were holding, but because interest rates are much higher now than when they bought the bonds they took a big loss selling the bonds.  When people found out about that they all panicked that the bank wouldn't have enough cash and tried to pull out their deposits.  At which the government stepped in and shut things down.
The FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) was created during the Great Depression to stop exactly this sort of thing.  They guarantee that depositors will get their money back (so no need to panic anyone).  Except FDIC insurance only covers $250k and a lot of these companies had way more banked at SVB.  So there was a lot of hand-wringing that most American tech startups would get wiped out because they were so heavily concentrated in this one bank.  So now the FDIC is basically saying they'll guarantee deposits without any limit.
Investors in the bank get nothing though; if you own stock in SVB it's now worthless.
 
There seems to be some differing opinions on whether other banks may fail.  The FDIC actions are intended to prevent panic that would cause such a thing, and the FDIC insurance exists to minimize the impact to people with money in any such bank.  But it's nerve-wracking to be holding stock in a bank, especially a smaller one, so there's a big sell-off that's hammering stock prices.
 
There were also a couple banks that were heavily tied into crypto that went belly-up, but that's not really related.

Silicon Valley Bank kind of specialized in lending to new tech companies.  At first they had so much money deposited they didn't know what to do with it, so they invested it in long-term bonds and similar.  But now those tech companies aren't doing so great so they started pulling their money out of the bank.  In order to have enough cash to pay out, the bank had to sell some of those bonds they were holding, but because interest rates are much higher now than when they bought the bonds they took a big loss selling the bonds.  When people found out about that they all panicked that the bank wouldn't have enough cash and tried to pull out their deposits.  At which the government stepped in and shut things down.
The FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) was created during the Great Depression to stop exactly this sort of thing.  They guarantee that depositors will get their money back (so no need to panic anyone).  Except FDIC insurance only covers $250k and a lot of these companies had way more banked at SVB.  So there was a lot of hand-wringing that most American tech startups would get wiped out because they were so heavily concentrated in this one bank.  So now the FDIC is basically saying they'll guarantee deposits without any limit.
Investors in the bank get nothing though; if you own stock in SVB it's now worthless.
 
There seems to be some differing opinions on whether other banks may fail.  The FDIC actions are intended to prevent panic that would cause such a thing, and the FDIC insurance exists to minimize the impact to people with money in any such bank.  But it's nerve-wracking to be holding stock in a bank, especially a smaller one, so there's a big sell-off that's hammering stock prices.
 
There were also a couple banks that were heavily tied into crypto that went belly-up, but that's not really related.

Silicon Valley Bank kind of specialized in lending to new tech companies.  At first they had so much money deposited they didn't know what to do with it, so they invested it in long-term bonds and similar.  But now those tech companies aren't doing so great so they started pulling their money out of the bank.  In order to have enough cash to pay out, the bank had to sell some of those bonds they were holding, but because interest rates are much higher now than when they bought the bonds they took a big loss selling the bonds.  When people found out about that they all panicked that the bank wouldn't have enough cash and tried to pull out their deposits.  At which the government stepped in and shut things down.
The FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) was created during the Great Depression to stop exactly this sort of thing.  They guarantee that depositors will get their money back (so no need to panic anyone).  Except FDIC insurance only covers $250k and a lot of these companies had way more banked at SVB.  So there was a lot of hand-wringing that most American tech startups would get wiped out because they were so heavily concentrated in this one bank.  So now the FDIC is basically saying they'll guarantee deposits without any limit.
Investors in the bank get nothing though; if you own stock in SVB it's now worthless.
 
There seems to be some differing opinions on whether other banks may fail.  The FDIC actions are intended to prevent panic that would cause such a thing, and the FDIC insurance exists to minimize the impact to people with money in any such bank.  But it's nerve-wracking to be holding stock in a bank, especially a smaller one, so there's a big sell-off that's hammering stock prices.
 
There were also a couple banks that were heavily tied into crypto that went belly-up, but that's not really related.

Silicon Valley Bank kind of specialized in lending to new tech companies.  At first they had so much money deposited they didn't know what to do with it, so they invested it in long-term bonds and similar.  But now those tech companies aren't doing so great so they started pulling their money out of the bank.  In order to have enough cash to pay out, the bank had to sell some of those bonds they were holding, but because interest rates are much higher now than when they bought the bonds they took a big loss selling the bonds.  When people found out about that they all panicked that the bank wouldn't have enough cash and tried to pull out their deposits.  At which the government stepped in and shut things down.
The FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation) was created during the Great Depression to stop exactly this sort of thing.  They guarantee that depositors will get their money back (so no need to panic anyone).  Except FDIC insurance only covers $250k and a lot of these companies had way more banked at SVB.  So there was a lot of hand-wringing that most American tech startups would get wiped out because they were so heavily concentrated in this one bank.  So now the FDIC is basically saying they'll guarantee deposits without any limit.
Investors in the bank get nothing though; if you own stock in SVB it's now worthless.
 
There seems to be some differing opinions on whether other banks may fail.  The FDIC actions are intended to prevent panic that would cause such a thing, and the FDIC insurance exists to minimize the impact to people with money in any such bank.  But it's nerve-wracking to be holding stock in a bank, especially a smaller one, so there's a big sell-off that's hammering stock prices.
 
There were also a couple banks that were heavily tied into crypto that went belly-up, but that's not really related.